;
loder

Section 25 - Power of Supreme Court to transfer suits, etc

Bailabel Type : bailable

Description

Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908, grants the Supreme Court of India the power to transfer cases and suits from one court to another within the country. This provision is intended to ensure that the interest of justice is upheld by giving the highest judicial authority the ability to intervene when cases cannot be fairly heard in the lower courts due to certain circumstances. The section empowers the Supreme Court to take necessary steps to ensure that judicial proceedings occur in the most appropriate forum, which is crucial for maintaining justice, impartiality, and efficiency.


Key Features of Section 25 - Power of Supreme Court to Transfer Suits, Etc.

  1. Power of the Supreme Court:

    • Section 25 grants the Supreme Court the power to transfer any suit, appeal, or other proceeding from one court to another, even across different jurisdictions, when it is deemed necessary for the sake of justice and fairness.
    • This is a wide discretionary power given to the Supreme Court to facilitate the proper hearing of matters by courts where proceedings can be carried out without prejudice, undue delay, or bias.
  2. Reasons for Transfer:

    • There are several situations in which the Supreme Court may consider it appropriate to transfer a case:
      • Inconvenience of the parties: If the parties involved are facing difficulties in accessing a particular court due to geographical constraints, or if it would be too costly or burdensome for one or more parties to attend court proceedings in a distant location.
      • Risk of prejudice: If there is a risk of prejudice to one party due to local influences, bias, or the involvement of specific interests that could affect the fairness of the trial.
      • Overburdened courts: If the court where the case is currently filed is overloaded with cases, thereby delaying the proceedings, the Supreme Court may transfer the case to a court with fewer cases or one that can handle it more expeditiously.
      • Interstate or inter-jurisdictional issues: When the case involves parties, properties, or events spread across different states or jurisdictions, leading to practical difficulties in litigation.
      • Public interest: In some cases, it may be transferred for reasons of public interest or efficiency, particularly in high-profile matters or cases of national importance.
  3. Application for Transfer:

    • A party seeking to have a case transferred must file an application to the Supreme Court justifying why the transfer is necessary.
    • The Supreme Court evaluates the application based on the circumstances of the case, including factors like the suitability of the current court, the location of the parties, and any concerns about bias or injustice.
  4. Procedure for Transfer:

    • The Supreme Court will consider the application and, if it finds merit in the reasons provided, will pass an order to transfer the case to another court.
    • Once a decision is made, the transfer is carried out swiftly, and the case continues in the newly assigned court from the stage it had reached in the previous court.
  5. Discretion of the Supreme Court:

    • The power to transfer cases under Section 25 is discretionary and can be exercised based on the Supreme Court's assessment of the justice of the case. It is not automatic and depends on the unique circumstances presented in each application.
    • In deciding whether to transfer a case, the Supreme Court considers both the legal and factual aspects of the case and the welfare of the parties.
  6. Impact on the Trial:

    • When the Supreme Court transfers a case, it does not affect the merits of the case. The suit or proceeding continues to be heard based on its own substance, but in a different court.
    • This ensures that the process remains unbiased and that any possible disadvantages faced by the parties in the original court are minimized.
  7. Supreme Court’s Role in Managing Justice System:

    • This provision reflects the role of the Supreme Court as the guardian of justice in India. It ensures that no individual or party suffers due to local bias, logistical issues, or other constraints that may impede a fair trial.
    • Section 25 also promotes national uniformity in the administration of justice, allowing the Supreme Court to ensure that cases are decided in the most appropriate legal setting.
  8. Transfer of Suits, Appeals, and Other Proceedings:

    • Section 25 applies not just to suits but also to appeals and other proceedings, allowing the Supreme Court to ensure that appeals from lower courts are heard in courts that are most suited to decide those matters without undue interference.
    • For instance, an appeal against a judgment from a lower court can be transferred if the appellant shows good cause to seek a transfer, such as bias in the original court or any logistical difficulties in attending proceedings.
  9. Interim Relief During Transfer:

    • If a case is transferred under Section 25, the Supreme Court may also pass interim orders to protect the rights of the parties during the transfer process. This can include staying proceedings or providing temporary relief to prevent any harm to the parties before the new court takes up the matter.
  10. Review of Transfer Orders:

    • If a party is dissatisfied with the transfer order made by the Supreme Court, there is no further review of such decisions. The transfer order is generally final and binding, though appeals or petitions may still be pursued on other legal grounds if needed.

Punishment

  • No Punishment for Application of Section 25:

    • Section 25 does not directly prescribe any punishment for parties involved in seeking or granting transfers. Its purpose is more focused on promoting fairness and justice in civil matters by allowing a higher court to ensure that cases are heard in the most suitable court.
    • The section does not penalize parties for asking for a transfer unless the request is frivolous, malicious, or made for strategic delay purposes.
  • Consequences for Misuse:

    • If a party is found to be abusing the process of seeking a transfer, such as by filing applications that are not supported by legitimate reasons, they may be penalized with costs. This could include paying the costs of the transfer or compensation for any inconvenience caused to the other party.
  • Delays in Transfer:

    • Delays in processing the transfer application may lead to costs being imposed on the party seeking the transfer. The party could be liable for costs caused due to unnecessary delays, particularly if the Supreme Court or the receiving court deems the transfer unnecessary or unjustified.
  • Transfer Orders and Administrative Consequences:

    • If a transfer order causes undue delay or inconvenience to the parties, it can lead to a delay in finalizing the case, which may negatively impact the case for both parties, especially if there is a statutory time limit for resolving certain types of cases.
  • Googling your legal issue online?
    The internet is not a lawyer and
    neither you.

    Talk to a real lawyer about your
    legal issue.
    FIND MY LAWYER NOW
    May ! I help you ?
    đŸ’¬
    ;