Description

Section 29 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908, provides the legal framework for the service of foreign summonses in India. This section is important for cases where the defendant is outside India or a foreign entity is involved in a suit that is being heard in an Indian court. It ensures that the courts in India can give effect to foreign judgments or suits and that individuals or entities located in foreign jurisdictions are properly notified of the legal proceedings.

The section ensures that foreign summonses, which are issued by courts outside India, are served in a manner that respects the international legal principles and ensures that the defendant is given proper notice and opportunity to defend themselves. Section 29 establishes how Indian courts will handle foreign summonses and their validity for service in India.

---

Key Features of Section 29 - Service of Foreign Summonses

1. Application of Foreign Summonses:

   • Section 29 enables Indian courts to accept and issue foreign summonses to individuals or entities residing in India. This happens when there is a suit or legal proceedings pending in a foreign court, and the summons issued by the foreign court needs to be served in India.
   • The foreign summons can be related to various types of cases, including civil, commercial, or family disputes, as long as the Indian court has jurisdiction over the subject matter or the defendant.

2. Mode of Service:

   • The section allows the Indian courts to issue directions for the service of foreign summonses on the defendant residing in India.
   • The summons from the foreign court can be served through similar methods as those prescribed under Indian law for domestic summons. These include:
     • Personal service: The summons can be served personally on the defendant, either through a process server or bailiff.
     • Registered post: The foreign summons can be sent to the defendant via registered post.
     • Substituted service: If personal service is not possible, substituted service can be permitted. This might include serving the summons through affixation or publication in a newspaper.

3. Verification of Foreign Summons:

   • Foreign summonses must be duly verified, and the Indian courts will typically require that the summonses be sent through proper diplomatic channels or consulates to ensure their authenticity.
   • The court can ask for a certificate of authenticity from the foreign court to verify that the summons is issued according to the legal standards of the country in question.

4. Translation of Foreign Summonses:

   • If the foreign summonses are issued in a language other than English or the local language of the court, the court may require a translation of the summons to be submitted.
   • The translation must be accurate and done by an authorized translator to ensure that the defendant fully understands the nature of the suit and the proceedings.

5. Jurisdictional Issues:

   • Section 29 also ensures that even if a foreign summons is served in India, the Indian court must have jurisdiction over the subject matter of the case. It ensures that Indian courts respect the jurisdictional principles of foreign courts but only to the extent that it does not violate the Indian legal system’s jurisdictional boundaries.
   • The Indian court can exercise its discretion in determining whether to entertain the foreign suit, especially when there are issues related to Indian public policy or conflict of laws.

6. Foreign Judgments and Execution:

   • This provision ties into the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in India. If a foreign court has issued a judgment in favor of one party, the judgment can be enforced in India under Section 13 and Section 44A of the CPC.
   • Similarly, if the foreign summons is part of a suit that seeks to enforce a foreign judgment, Indian courts may entertain the suit and take appropriate steps for execution.

7. Role of the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA):

   • The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) is often involved in the transmission and receipt of foreign summonses through the Indian embassy or consulate in the country where the summons originates.
   • The MEA may also facilitate the service of summonses that require transmission through diplomatic channels to ensure proper legal procedures are followed.

8. Comity of Nations:

   • The application of Section 29 must be in accordance with the principle of comity of nations, which refers to the recognition of legal processes from one country by another. Indian courts generally recognize foreign summonses, provided they meet the procedural and legal standards of fairness and reciprocity.

9. Enforceability of Foreign Judgments:

   • This section, although focused on service, also indirectly addresses the enforceability of foreign judgments in India. For a foreign judgment to be executed, the foreign judgment must be final, conclusive, and not contrary to Indian public policy. Section 29 ensures that the necessary procedures are followed for this process, including service of foreign summonses.

10. Limitations on Service:

    • Section 29 places no limitation on the jurisdiction of the court where the summons is served, as long as the foreign court’s decision is recognized by Indian law and the legal procedures for service are properly followed.
    • However, the Indian courts may refuse to entertain or enforce a foreign summons if it violates Indian public policy or involves subjects not governed by international law or treaties to which India is a signatory.

Punishment

Failure to Respond to Foreign Summons:

• If the defendant fails to respond to a foreign summons served in India, and the court finds that the service was done properly, the court may proceed with the case in ex parte (in the absence of the defendant). This means the judgment may be passed based solely on the plaintiff’s evidence and claims.
• The defendant will typically lose the opportunity to contest the suit or present a defense unless they can show that the service was improper or that they were unaware of the proceedings.

Obstruction or Non-compliance with Service:

• If the defendant intentionally evades service of the foreign summons, the court may treat such actions as an obstruction to the judicial process. This may lead to penalties, fines, or even contempt of court proceedings.
• The court may issue additional orders to ensure the defendant is properly served, including the issuance of warrants or substituted service orders.

Incorrect Service or Failure to Serve:

• If the foreign summons is not served properly, or if it is found that the procedures under Section 29 were not followed (e.g., failure to provide proper translations or verify authenticity), the court may order the summons to be re-served or dismiss the case until service is properly executed.
• The plaintiff may incur additional costs for the improper service, and the case may be delayed.

Failure to Follow Diplomatic Procedures:

• If the service of foreign summons is not carried out through the correct diplomatic or consular channels, or if comity of nations principles are not adhered to, the Indian court may refuse to recognize or enforce the summons.
• Any failure to comply with international agreements or legal norms could result in the dismissal of the case or non-recognition of the service of summons.