Description

Section 36 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908, deals with the application of the provisions in the Code to orders passed by the court in civil cases. This section essentially extends the procedural provisions of the CPC to orders, ensuring that the execution of civil court orders follows a standard procedure, akin to the execution of decrees.

---

Key Features of Section 36 - Application to Orders

1. Purpose and Applicability:

   • The primary purpose of Section 36 is to ensure that the same procedure that applies to the execution of decrees is applied to the execution of orders passed by the court in civil suits. The section ensures uniformity and efficiency in dealing with both decrees and orders, avoiding any discrepancies between them.
   • The section clarifies that unless otherwise specified, all orders passed by a civil court, whether interlocutory or final, are to be executed in the same manner as a decree.

2. Definition of an "Order":

   • An order refers to any decision or direction passed by the court in the course of a case. This could include decisions on applications, motions, or interim relief, and it is not necessarily a final resolution of the case.
   • For instance, the order might relate to the granting of an injunction, appointment of a receiver, or any other order made in the course of proceedings. These orders could be of both interlocutory (temporary) or final nature.

3. Execution of Orders:

   • Just like a decree, orders passed by the court can also be executed if the party against whom the order is made fails to comply with it.
   • For instance, if a party is ordered to pay a certain amount by the court or to do something specific, and they fail to do so, the execution provisions of the CPC will apply, and enforcement measures like attachment of property, contempt of court proceedings, etc., can be used.
   • Execution of orders follows the same procedure as for decrees, ensuring that the court’s orders are implemented effectively.

4. Provision for the Execution of Interim Orders:

   • Section 36 also covers the execution of interim orders, which are temporary orders passed during the pendency of a case. These could include orders of injunction or stay, among others.
   • These orders are given the same status as final orders for purposes of execution, and if a party refuses to comply with an interim order, the same steps for enforcement as in the case of final orders can be taken.

5. Scope and Limitation:

   • While the section applies the procedure for the execution of orders similar to the execution of decrees, it is important to note that not all types of orders are executable in the same manner. For example, orders related to discretionary powers of the court may not be enforceable in the same way as orders of specific performance or monetary compensation.
   • Certain orders, such as orders requiring a party to do or refrain from doing something, can be executed through contempt of court proceedings or other means like attachment of property.

6. Order of Compliance:

   • The purpose of this section is to make sure that every order passed by the court is followed, and if a party fails to comply, they can be punished for non-compliance.
   • For instance, in a case where a party is ordered to pay a specific sum of money, and they fail to do so, the aggrieved party can seek to execute the order through various enforcement mechanisms available under the CPC.

7. Effect on Subsequent Orders:

   • The execution provisions for an order do not affect the subsequent orders that may be passed by the court. A court’s subsequent orders can modify or supersede earlier orders, but the execution process remains consistent for all types of orders unless specifically varied by the court.

8. Applicability to Specific Orders:

   • Section 36 is especially relevant in cases involving injunctions, attachments, or other forms of enforcement-related orders. The provisions ensure that these orders are not rendered ineffective due to lack of a clear enforcement mechanism.
   • For instance, an order of injunction directing a party not to sell property can be enforced through the attachment of property if the order is violated, in the same manner as a decree.

Punishment

1. Non-Compliance with Orders:

   • The punishment for non-compliance with court orders could be in the form of execution proceedings, which can lead to the attachment of the defendant’s property, garnishment of wages, or even contempt of court proceedings.
   • In cases of contempt of court, the responsible party can be fined or imprisoned, depending on the seriousness of the disobedience.

2. Disobedience of Interim Orders:

   • When there is non-compliance with an interim order, especially those related to temporary injunctions, the court has the power to impose penalties, including contempt sanctions.
   • If an order of specific performance or any other directive is not complied with, the court can enforce the order by various means, which may include imposing costs or awarding compensatory damages.

3. Execution of Orders:

   • In cases where orders are not voluntarily complied with, the court may direct the attachment of the offending party’s assets or seize property to enforce the order.
   • The punishment for failure to comply can include the application of civil procedures such as attachment, sale of property, and other measures to compel compliance.

4. Contempt of Court:

   • Contempt of Court is another form of punishment available under Section 36 when a party refuses to comply with the court’s order. It may result in imprisonment or monetary fines. The seriousness of the offense determines the severity of the punishment.
   • Disobedience of orders such as interim injunctions, payment orders, or specific performance may also attract contempt charges, leading to penalties or imprisonment.